Document Actions
COPE 1998 report
Full text of the COPE Report 1998 | [View PDF] | |
| Individual pages of the COPE Report 1998: | ||
| The birth of the Committee on Publication Ethics Michael J G Farthing | [View PDF] | |
| Editorials in The Lancet and the BMJ Michael J G Farthing, Richard Horton and Richard Smith | [View PDF] | |
Reseach misconduct: How should editors respond? | ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| Free paper session | ||
| COPE diary | ||
| Cases considered by COPE | ||
| Case 97/01: Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/04: Redundant publication | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/02: Disputed authorship | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/16: Double plagiarism | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/09: An author plagiarising the work of the reviewer? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/07: Plagiarism | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/11: The fraudalent letter | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/19: The tortuous tale of a paper, a letter, and an editorial | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/01: Blatant example of duplicate publication? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/09: A commentary on a piece of (unethical) research | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/06: The critical commentary? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/18: The perfect study but no investigational drug | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/08: The reviewer writes comments that he doesn't want the author to see | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/03: Disagreement between a reviewer and an author | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/10: Informed consent | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/02: Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of peer review? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/17: Not getting consent from an ethics committee | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/05: Failing to get consent from an ethics committee | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/03: Unethical research undertaken by a single handed GP | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/05: Patient consent and non-consent | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/04: Living unrelated (commercial) organ transplantation | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/07: False memory syndrome | [View PDF] | |
| Cases submitted to COPE | ||
| Case 98/10: Unethical research | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/15: Questions of authorship, duplicate publication, and copyright | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/12: Possible duplicate publication? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/11: Grounds for retraction? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 98/08: Redundant publication? | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/06: Attempted redundant publication | [View PDF] | |
| Case 97/13: Suspected fabrication of data | [View PDF] | |
| References | [View PDF] | |
| List of delegates | [View PDF] | |
