Personal tools
You are here: Home Reports 2002
Document Actions

COPE 2002 reports


Full text of the COPE Report 2002

[View PDF]
Individual pages of the COPE Report 2002:
 
COPE's fifth year
Michael J G Farthing
[View PDF]

COPE Council, Committee and Membership[View PDF]

Promoting integrity in research and publication
Proceedings of a seminar held on 18 October 2002 at BMA House, London

 
  • Introduction: COPE moves on
    Michael J G Farthing
[View PDF]
  • Does research misconduct extend beyond biomedicine?
    Ritu Dhand
[View PDF]
  • The research integrity initiative: progress report
    Sir Peter Lachmann
[View PDF]
  • COPE sets an agenda for research
    Fiona Godlee
[View PDF]
  • COPE takes a role in education
    Sabine Kleinert and Faith McLellan
    Workshops: peer review dilemmas for editors, authors and reviewers
[View PDF]
 
Guidance on presenting cases to COPE[View PDF]
 
Update on cases submitted to COPE[View PDF]

Cases submitted to COPE July 2001 to July 2002

Case 01/05: No ethics committee approval or informed consent[View PDF]
Case 01/26: Possible plagiarism in a cross over, double blind placebo controlled study[View PDF]
Case 01/27: Query triplicate publication?[View PDF]
Case 01/28: Plagiarism in a case report[View PDF]
Case 01/29: Revised version different from original version submitted[View PDF]
Case 01/30: Ethical standards in animal research[View PDF]
Case 01/31: Publication of dead patient's name at the request of the family[View PDF]
Case 01/32: Anonymous case representations (without patient consent) on a specialist society website[View PDF]
Case 01/33: Redundant publication and a question of authorship[View PDF]
Case 01/34: Allegation of reviewer malpractice[View PDF]
Case 01/35: Randomised controlled trial without ethics committee approval[View PDF]
Case 01/36: Plagiarism[View PDF]
Case 01/37: Stolen data and ommission from the authorship list[View PDF]
Case 01/38: Difficulty in obtaining patient consent[View PDF]
Case 01/39: Referee with a conflict of interest[View PDF]
Case 02/01: New surgical technique without evidence of either ethics committee approval or patient consent[View PDF]
Case 02/02: Duplicate publication[View PDF]
Case 02/03: Duplicate submission to two journals and previous duplicate publication uncovered[View PDF]
Case 02/04: Plagiarism[View PDF]
Case 02/05: New commercial cure for a common but incurable problem[View PDF]
Case 02/06: Late reinterpretation and a new author[View PDF]
Case 02/07: Consent from relatives for genetic tests[View PDF]
Case 02/08: An unethical ethics committee?[View PDF]

Guidelines on Good Publication Practice[View PDF]
 
Constitution of COPE[View PDF]
 

Powered by RedHat and Plone Hosted by BMJTechnology

This site conforms to the following standards: